PLEASE HURRY ILL GIVE POINTS Refer to the passage.

"If you come to consider the conditions a country requires to be thought to receive the excess of population flowing from European sources in such a state that the latter may have hopes of good prospects we find that to a relative depopulation and consequent cheapness of land with want of men to till the soil, you must add a mild and temperate climate which will induce the immigrants to establish in the land of his adoption and continue his old manner of living, without being obliged to habituate himself to a new system; there should be complete security for persons and property guaranteed by the laws and tribunals; there should also exist, at the very least, as much liberty of action and of thought as immigrants enjoyed at his own country; there should likewise exist proper means of communication which would facilitate an easy and cheap traffic between the parties, their ideas and their industrial products; and lastly there should reign throughout the country where the immigrants directs his steps a grade of civilization in all equal to that which is to be found in the most part of European governments.

All of these conditions are to be found . . . in the Argentine Republic.”

1883 government report on European immigration to the Argentine Republic

Which of the following best explains the goals of the Argentine Republic in encouraging immigration in the late 1800s?

It wanted to offset the migration of indigenous people to Europe.
It needed soldiers due to a looming crisis with neighboring Brazil.
It was experiencing labor shortages due to growing demand for exports.
It was seeking to replace labor lost to the emancipation of enslaved persons.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

in 1862, president lincoln's emancipation proclamation opened the door for african americans to enlist in the union army. although many had wanted to join the war effort earlier, they were prohibited from enlisting by a federal law dating back to 1792.

explanation: