subject
History, 15.12.2020 01:00 joshawajackson

“He is very valiant and has a great liking for warfare and weapons of war, which he has constantly in his hands: we have been eye-witnesses of this because, whenever we were with him, he was adjusting his (swords), testing his (muskets), etc... This is the great experience, which he has obtained of warfare over so many years, that he makes it in person and from the first has made him a fine soldier and very skilled, and his men so dexterous that they are little behind our men in Europe. He has introduced into his militia the use of and esteem for (muskets), in which they are very practiced. Therefore, it is that his realm has been so much extended on all sides . . . All the above mentioned soldiers, who will total some 100,000, receive pay for the whole year.” Father Simon, a European Roman Catholic priest, in a report to the pope on meeting the Safavid Shah Abbas I, 1588 3. Which claim about Father Simon’s purpose for meeting Shah Abbas I is best supported by the above passage? *
1 point
A. Simon was impressed by the new technology used by the Safavids.
B. Simon wanted the pope to know of the Safavid’s military power.
C. Simon hoped the pope would sell new weapons to the Safavids.
D. Simon thought the Safavids could teach the Europeans about how to organize a military

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 18:30, rosieposie27
Why did the united states become involved in the soviet-afghan war? the united states wanted access to the afghan oil fields. the united states wanted to retaliate against the soviet boycott of the 1984 olympics in los angeles. representative charlie wilson convinced congress to fund afghan resistance to soviet influence. president ronald reagan wanted to force the soviets to withdraw from afghanistan.
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 23:00, rossy84
How did thomas hobbes’s interpretation of the social contract differ from john locke’s?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 01:00, liljobe8973
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against japan in 1945? using the bomb would destroy the armaments still available to japanese forces in japan. using the bomb would demonstrate the power of the united states to the entire world. using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops. using the bomb would enable allied forces to invade and take over the japanese mainland
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 02:00, SMNS625
Iam told that hundreds if not thousands of these (armenians) were sent at once to the front ranks at the dardanelles, where death in a very short space of time is almost a certainty. the older men were then deported into the interior, while the women and children, when not carried off in an opposite direction, were left to shift for themselves as best they could. the terrible feature of this deportation up to date is that it has been carried out on such a basis as to render it practically impossible in thousands of cases that these families can ever again be reunited. not only wives and husbands, brothers and sisters, but even mothers and their little children have been dispersed in such a manner as to preclude practically all hope that they will ever see each other again. according to this excerpt, what does the author consider to be the worst part of the deportation during the armenian genocide?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
“He is very valiant and has a great liking for warfare and weapons of war, which he has constantly i...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 06.01.2020 22:31