subject
History, 14.12.2020 23:50 toshahoskins0098

In the 1600s, why didn’t the King of England always know what was happening in the American colonies? The king was not very interested in the American colonies. The colonies governed themselves, so he did not need to know. The colonies were far away, and it took a long time for news to reach him. The king did not appoint the colonial governors, so no one reported to him.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 04:30, nayelimoormann
What is a characteristic of hunter-gatherer societies?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:20, eelebron0905
As a result of the germanic tribes sacking rome
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 11:30, randyg0531
Were the terms of the treaty of versailles reasonable?
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 13:50, kattydominguez15
Imagine instead that angel raich and diane monson were arrested at a pro-medical marijuana rally they had organized in a public park in california and faced several charges: 1. violating a public decency statute because they were wearing t-shirts that read "ignore the feds, weed is not a crime! " with pictures of marijuana leaves surrounded by flames and guns, and 2. violating a town regulation that prohibited being in the park after sunset. raich and monson argue that both charges should be dropped because their actions were protected by the first amendment. 1. what is raich and monson's argument that they should be allowed to wear their t shirts 2. what is raich and monson's argument that they should be allowed to organize a rally in a public park? 3. what is the weakness is raich and monson's argument about the rally?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In the 1600s, why didn’t the King of England always know what was happening in the American colonies...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Business, 18.12.2019 09:31
Konu
Mathematics, 18.12.2019 09:31