In science, this law is well-known: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Consider the idea that the Reformation was an ACTION and the Counter-Reformation was the REACTION. Explain this idea in a short paragraph using facts and information from the lesson to support your response.

What does the case of mary dyer in 1660 illustrate? a. puritans practiced a fierce rhetoric but were lenient in practice. b. quakers had a tenuous grasp on the social realities of the english colonies. c. quakers were willing to defy authority even at their own personal risk and expense. d. quakers practiced their religion without a church and without clergy.

What were the advantages and dis- advantages of how britain and france ruled in africa?

Ok serious americans were british ay don’t we have a british accent?