3. What brought an end to the “normal state of hostility” between the
Safavids and Ottomans mentioned in the passage?
(A) Safavid fervor for its brand of Islam slowly declined until the two
empires stopped fighting.
(B) The constant fighting increased the respect of the empires for each
other, which eventually led to peace between them.
(C) Both sides united to fight against European Christian forces that
threatened them.
(D) The Ottomans slowly weakened until the Safavids no longer saw
them as a threat.
Answers: 2
History, 21.06.2019 23:30, jeanetteelliotp9ru6m
“well,” he says, “there’s excuse for picks and letting-on, in a case like this; if it warn’t so, i wouldn’t approve of it, nor i wouldn’t stand by and see the rules broke—because right is right, and wrong is wrong, and a body ain’t got no business doing wrong when he ain’t ignorant and knows better. it might answer for you to dig jim out with a pick, without any letting-on, because you don’t know no better; but it wouldn’t for me, because i do know better.” the meaning in this excerpt is
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 07:30, MikeWrice4494
Brainliesttt !me : ) describe the responses to terrorism in the united states.
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 17:00, daisa02
Which statement best explain later a stance a conservative might take on gun control? a) there should be certain restrictions to gun ownership. b) gun control efforts violate the second amendment c) background checks should become a requirement d) the brady bill brought about needed changes
Answers: 3
3. What brought an end to the “normal state of hostility” between the
Safavids and Ottomans mention...
Mathematics, 04.05.2021 03:30
Arts, 04.05.2021 03:30
Social Studies, 04.05.2021 03:30
History, 04.05.2021 03:30
Computers and Technology, 04.05.2021 03:40