subject
History, 04.12.2020 23:50 cookies1164

What was the author implying when she wrote the sentence?
Read the passage again, and focus on the line that
begins with "If you visit a factory
Unless you have visited the manufacturing towns and
seen the workers of Manchester, you cannot appreciate
the physical and moral degradation of this class of the
population. Most workers lack clothing, bed, furniture,
fuel wholesome food-even potatoes! They spend from
twelve to fourteen hours each day shut up in low-
ceilinged rooms where with every breath of foul air they
absorb fibers of cotton, wool or flax, or particles of
copper, lead or iron. They live suspended between an
insufficiency of food and an excess of strong drink; they
are all wizened, sickly and emaciated, their bodies thin
and frail, their limbs feeble, their complexions pale, their
eyes dead. If you visit a factory, it is easy to see that the
comfort and welfare of the workers have never entered
the builder's head.
God! Can progress be bought only at the cost of men's
The conditions of the employees are of no
concern to the employer
The conditions of the factory are adequate for the
employees
The conditions in the factory have never been
questioned by the employee
O The conditions in the factory are of no concern to
the employee
live

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:50, dangrueneberg9124
Which of the following scenarios illustrates the cultural impact of expanded regional trade for postclassical civilizations? o a. the byzantine empire rises in place of the roman empire. o b. an islamic scholar attends a university in his hometown. o c. internal disputes weaken a large african empire. o d. an arabian sultan wears a robe made from chinese silk.
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, TerronRice
How did the united states surprise other delegates at the washington naval conference in 1921?
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 20:20, dpazmembreno
What happened right after the battle of concord ?
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, llama1314
What was true about sharecropping? a. landowner provided free tools and seeds. b. workers could leave the land if they failed to make money. c. landowners often took advantage of workers. d. workers received ownership of the land they farmed after a set number of years.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What was the author implying when she wrote the sentence?
Read the passage again, and focus o...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Chemistry, 03.10.2019 13:50
Konu
History, 03.10.2019 13:50