subject
History, 04.12.2020 21:10 Fhalcon543

Read the excerpt from Eighty Years and More: Reminiscences, 1815-1897. I still recall, too, going into the large darkened parlor to see my brother, and finding the casket, mirrors, and pictures all draped in white, and my father seated by his side, pale and immovable. As he took no notice of me, after standing a long while, I climbed upon his knee, when he mechanically put his arm about me and, with my head resting against his beating heart, we both sat in silence, he thinking of the wreck of all his hopes in the loss of a dear son, and I wondering what could be said or done to fill the void in his breast.

Which best retells the central idea in this excerpt?

-Stanton’s memory of her brother’s funeral is still fresh in her mind.
-Stanton develops a need to please her father during childhood.
-Stanton decides she must work to discover the cause of her brother’s death.
-Stanton’s relationship with her father is stronger than that of her sisters.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 14:00, rmathias485
Tobacco brides sent virginia to marry, often found themselves a.) divorced soon after they arrived b.) less likely to inherit than they would have been in britain c.) widowed young and in charge of large estates d.) poor and alone e.) all of the above
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:30, dawsoncollins4117
Why did the other allies like great britain and france not support wilsons 14 points?
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 05:00, tracyaleblanc
What did the mexican solders eat during 1833
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the excerpt from Eighty Years and More: Reminiscences, 1815-1897. I still recall, too, going i...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 12.01.2021 23:00
Konu
Arts, 12.01.2021 23:00