subject
History, 30.11.2020 19:40 shahrukhafridi2668

HELP PLEASE FOR A BRAINLIEST Which statement is best supported by the fact that Lemuel Haynes fought in the Connecticut militia during the American Revolution? (4 points)

1.The British military refused to let African Americans enlist in its ranks.
2.Haynes and other slaves were forced to fight for the American revolutionaries.
3.Haynes believed that an independent America could help all people be free.
4.Patriot political leaders had promised to free slaves if the colonies won the war.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 19:30, zoeycrew
In the decision for dred scott vs. sanford, (1857) in which a slave petitioned for his freedom in a st. louis court, on the grounds that his owner had taken him into free territory, and thus he ought no longer be regarded as possessing "slave" status, but should be regarded as a free man, the court decided as follows (excerpt): "in the circuit courts of the united states, the record must show that the case is one in which by the constitution and laws of the united states, the court had jurisdiction--and if this does not appear, and the court gives judgment either for plaintiff or defendant, it is error, and the judgment must be reversed by this court--and the parties cannot by consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the circuit court. a free negro of the african race, whose ancestors were brought to this country and sold as slaves, is not a 'citizen' within the meaning of the constitution of the united states. when the constitution was adopted, they were not regarded in any of the states as members of the community which constituted the state, and were not numbered among its 'people or citizen.' consequently, the special rights and immunities guarantied to citizens do not apply to them. and not being "citizens" within the meaning of the constitution, they are not entitled to sue in that character in a court of the united states, and the circuit court has not jurisdiction in such a suit. the only two clauses in the constitution which point to this race, treat them as persons whom it was morally lawful to deal in as articles of property and to hold as slaves. since the adoption of the constitution of the united states, no state can by any subsequent law make a foreigner or any other description of persons citizens of the united states, nor entitle them to the rights and privileges secured to citizens by that instrument." why does the court say that the petitioning party in this case had no right to sue for his freedom? a) because he is too young b) because he is from a different state c) because he is "of the african race" with enslaved ancestors d) because he is, properly speaking, within his owner's jurisdiction
Answers: 1
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:00, ninilizovtskt
Which landmark supreme court case ruled that segregation by race in public education was unconstitutional? a. miranda v. arizona b. plessy v. ferguson c. brown v. board of education of topeka d. alexander v. holmes county board of education
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:30, deshaunmosley66
This passage best represents which of these theories in the declaration of independence?
Answers: 3
image
History, 22.06.2019 13:30, Izzyfizzy
During world war ii, the battle of the coral sea was significant because it
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
HELP PLEASE FOR A BRAINLIEST Which statement is best supported by the fact that Lemuel Haynes fough...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 16.09.2019 04:10
Konu
Mathematics, 16.09.2019 04:10
Konu
Mathematics, 16.09.2019 04:10