05.06 Friend or Foe, Mexico? FLVS

1 -Describe events that explain the border differences between these maps. Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.

There are clear differences in territorial borders. The United States

gained not only the land in its expansion but the authority that goes with

it. More especially they have greater access to wealth and resources

giving them an edge in purchasing and owning more and more lands

and territories.

2 -Besides land, what did the United States gain from expansion? Use information from the maps and the lesson in your response. Use complete sentences.

One reason could be interest in natural resources. This is common in

territories that have resources such as gold, oil and coal. Also the

southerners wanted to use this new land to just continue slavery.

Step Two: Answer the question below using the framework

provided.

People disagree whether the United States should have gone to war against Mexico. Should the United States have declared war? Consider information from the lesson and maps to explain your claim with at least two reasons.

The United States should have declared war because there were many

mixed relationships between the US and Mexico. The us wanted Texas

to help complete the idea of Manifest Destiny. Mexico was not fit to

govern Texas. Reason 1 the US joined the war because the Mexicans

provoked the war by killing Americans. A second reason is Mexico

wasn't fit for Texas because Mexicans killed Americans on disputed

territory. The Americans were made that blood was being shed on

American soil.

Step Three: Form your counterargument using the framework provided. Reporter McQuill mentions your claim will be stronger if you respond well to someone who disagrees with you. Use this framework to challenge a counterclaim.

Even though some people think that the fact that the United States won

is a reason to celebrate, it is also true that this victory has likely led to

worse diplomatic relations with Mexico.

Explanation:

I did this the teacher gave me a 87% i think that´s still good.

Hope it helps :) (can i have brainliest pls)

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."