Write a one-minute speech (about 200 words) where you argue for or against U. S. involvement in World War II. Be sure to also acknowledge a counterclaim to your argument. can somebody help me pls need it now.

America had to get involved in the war.

Explanation:

Just like in the First World War, when America remained neutral, a similar thing happened at the beginning of the Second World War. We were forced to defend ourselves. America did not enter the war on its own but was drawn in. So the United States did not intend to be part of that global madness, but the country came to a situation where it had to defend itself. The attack on Pearl Harbor directly violated the integrity and sovereignty of the country. America was one of the world's most powerful powers at the time, so there was a moral obligation to fight the Third Reich's brutal policies and their allies.

If the United States had not been involved in the war, then the world would not be the same today. It is likely that after the Soviet Union and Britain, the United States would be the target of Hitler and his allies. Scenarios like Pearl Harbor would probably be even more so if the country had not joined the war in time. Hitler hated all those who emerged victorious from the First World War; he considered them guilty of Germany's situation. The United States was also on the list of those countries. Therefore, if America had not entered the war, and Hitler had won, the world would have been a terrible place.

the french revolution main idea was to give power to the people. the revolution was influenced by the enlightenment ideas, reasoning and skepticism pushed people to revolt against standards and norms in french society.

the problem was that the revolution caused political turmoil, and napoleon saw this as an opportunity and launched a coup d’état in november 1799. he became the first consul of france and later named french emperor.

some people see napoleon as a hero of the revolution and others see him as a traitor.

people see him as a traitor because he noticed the political turmoil and used this moment to rise to power. others see him as a hero of the revolution because he had some political and military achievements - in which he was committed to promoting the achievements of the french revolution - he had extensive public constructions, made a civil reform.

in a bigger picture, napoleon had some huge achievements in france which made him very important, but the fact that he seized power to himself makes him an undeniable traitor to the revolution since the main idea of it was to remove people from power and give power to the people.