subject
History, 27.11.2020 20:30 alvaradovanessa14

Einhard was a member of Charlemagne’s court and described him as “my lord and foster-father”. He also wrote that, “no man can write with more accuracy than I of events that took place about me, and of facts which I had personal knowledge.” Do you think he was biased? How accurate do you think these excerpts are?Explain your reasoning.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 22.06.2019 03:30, peno211
Which statement describes the impact of the 21st amendment?
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 04:00, genyjoannerubiera
45 were the 1920s a “return to normalcy” or a “time of great change”? submit it in a letter format.
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 11:30, ItsLeyArt
If the imperial dynasty had continued to rule china, it is most likely that a) the economy would have improved rather than weakened b) european nations would have gotten more of a foothold in china c) revolutionary groups would not have gained any power in the country d) communism would not have received support among the poor
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 15:00, katlynnschmolke
Me with these dbq articles 1. whether its reliable? why or why not? 2. what's the main idea 3. demonstrating new deal as success or failure?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Einhard was a member of Charlemagne’s court and described him as “my lord and foster-father”. He als...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 18.08.2020 22:01
Konu
Biology, 18.08.2020 22:01