Which of the following best explains why Holy Roman Emperor Charles V can be described as a political failure?

Hello. You didn't put the answer options, but we can say that Charles V's empire was considered a political failure because of the constant conflicts with France and the Ottoman Empire, which caused the exhaustion of the kingdom's finances, the establishment of a uncontrolled inflation, the revival of Italian wars and the uncontrollable advance of the Ottoman Empire in central Europe.

All of this made Charles V's government a weak one with more losses than gains. These losses forced him to make a series of abdications in 1556 that further weakened the kingdom.

lincoln declared that slavery should not be allowed to spread into the new states, and of course this angered the south at the time.

the revolution instituted a short-lived roman republic.