The 2010 Supreme Court case, Wagner v. Tritch, involves the illegal distribution of copyrighted material to foreign consumers via the Internet, which is a new area of law. The 9-0, unanimous vote on the Court is set to overturn the lower appellate court decision that Augustus Tritch was liable for millions of dollars to the plaintiff, Frederick Von Wagner, for illegally distributing his book to overseas customers. Now that the court has voted on the case, explain what must happen next? Describe the different types of opinions that could come from the Court.

Responses will vary. A sample response follows: Now that the Court has reached a decision, albeit a rare unanimous decision, Chief Justice John Roberts will assign the task of composing the majority opinion to either himself or an associate justice. This opinion will articulate the reasoning behind the Court’s decision to overturn the appellate decision. However, while there wouldn’t be a dissenting opinion (there were no dissenters), one or more justices from the majority may write a concurring decision in which they reach the same conclusion as the rest of the Court, but for different reasons.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.

this isn't a question and if you're going to list things be kind and use commas.