Please help, I'll give brainliest. This is about the Tea act of 1773. do not plagiarize, or put random characters, or you will be reported. 1. Why would the East India Company want to get rid of their tea?
2. What are issues that you see with the new Tea Act of 1773 for the colonists?
3. What do you think the colonists should have done in response to the Tea Act?

1. The Tea Act of 1773 was an act of Great Britain's Parliament to reduce the ... from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company

2. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard.

3. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.

1. The Tea Act of 1773 was an act of Great Britain's Parliament to reduce the ... from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company.

2.Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard.

3. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.

Explanation:

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.