subject
History, 20.11.2020 18:00 jbainbynn1296

Should a historian ever use a personal blog post as a secondary source for a research paper? No, blog posts can never be used as secondary sources, even if written by credible authors or posted on acceptable websites such as .gov or .org websites. No, blog posts should not be used as secondary sources because it is difficult to establish the credibility of the authors as they are often biased and do not always use facts. Yes, blog posts can always be used because they are either a primary or secondary source, and credibility concerns are secondary to the type of source. Yes, even if this information is biased, blog posts can be used as primary sources if balanced by facts, reasoned judgments, and analysis by more credible sources.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: History

image
History, 21.06.2019 17:50, lolz55678
Which of the following was an effect of allied defeats and high casualty rates on the eastern front? the united states issued the fourteen points. russia entered the war on the allied side. the united states entered the war sooner. russia experienced a revolution and dropped out of the war.
Answers: 3
image
History, 21.06.2019 22:00, nyceastcoast
Which of the following is a claim about ancient rome that a historian could build san argument around
Answers: 1
image
History, 22.06.2019 03:00, Mrblunt5613
Which of the following wrote detailed accounts about early native american? a) spanish b) french c) americans d) mexicansi need this !
Answers: 2
image
History, 22.06.2019 06:00, idahopotato5429
(easy 35 ) i am a confederate general during the civil war. who am i? 1. ulysses s. grant 2. robert e. lee 3. george mcclellan 4. winfield scott
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Should a historian ever use a personal blog post as a secondary source for a research paper? No, blo...

Questions in other subjects: