Why do you think was he greatly criticized on his work, Historia General de Filipinas and what are the suggestions that you could have given to him before the publication of this book?

Vidal was criticized for his work because it seemed inaccurate and with little veracity.

Explanation:

"Historia General de Filipinas" written by Vidal, was not well received by critics. That's because it showed a history with little evidence, which made the work imprecise, with little veracity and academically weak. Although the work was appreciated by many readers around the world, for its simple and direct language.

To correct the errors, I would advise Vidal to do more in-depth research on the history of the Philippines, finding documents that prove the facts he is addressing, making the narrative more accurate.

1.a)britain

2.b)spain

3.c)french

4.d)portugal

explanation:

answer by yourhope:

the speaker of which statement would be best served by joining an interest group?

i want politicians to make more of an effort for lgbt rights!

: )