"A short collection of certain reasons to convince her majesty (Queen Elizabeth of England) to pay for western voyages and the establishment of colonies in the nee world. The passages there and home is neither too long nor too short, but easy, and to be made twice a year. We shall be planting there the glory of gospel, and offer a safe and a sure place to receive people from all parts of the world that are forced to run away from the truth of God's words" -Richard Halkuyt, 1584 what is the best inference that can be made about England's reasons for colonization

A. The new world could bring wealth from gold and other precious metals

B. The new world could be safe haven for thoes who experienced religious persection

C. England could send criminals and debtors to the new world to work on farms

D. Travel time to the New World stopped England from investing in colonization

I need help quick please and thank you if you do.

40 points

definitely a for sure. ill see and update if i get the answer

during the 20th century, the role of the vice president has evolved into more of an executive branch position. now, the vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president's administration and presides over the senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed.

brainliest means the answer that is best and you found it very

if you ask any question and 2 persons gave you answer for your question and the answer of one person you liked the most and found it most the we can mark it as brainliest . at the side of every person's answer an option of brainliet then we can appericiate the user by marking it as brainlist

if someone marks our answer as brainliest then we can get ranks also

done.

1. yes it was the new deal introduced lots of regulations to workers, such as the national labour relations act of 1935 which workers to form unions and protected the members from other laws as well as forcing businesses to listen to the unions and their workers

2.the new deal had a lot of great ideas. but when fdr created the national industrial recovery act. they set prizes and work hours for the workers. the workers made more money ($.40 rather than $.20) but because they did not work as much they would end up making less money. after a while the supreme court found this act to be un-constitutional. but sense the people weren’t   making as much money they could not afford the products. even though the new deal was taken away in 1939 because the government became to powerful, there are still remnants of it in our government. national labor relations, social security, etc… the new deal alone did not end the depression but it the u.s.a dramatically and set them on the right track to recover and become the powerhouse of a country it is today.

3. yes it did bring some relief to those who were willing and able to work and it assisted in terms of creating new and strengthening existing infrastructure.  

4.