History, 19.11.2020 07:00 amourjenny

100 POINTS FOR CORRECT ANSWER ! Constitution of 1845: ART. 64. The Supreme Court shall be composed of one Chief Justice and of three associate justices, a majority of whom shall constitute a quorum. The Chief Justice shall receive a salary of six thousand dollars, and each of the associate justices a salary of five thousand five hundred dollars annually. The court shall appoint its own clerks. The judges shall be appointed for a term of eight years Constitution of 1852:
ART. 63. The Supreme Court shall be composed of one Chief Justice and four associate justices, a majority of whom shall constitute a quorum. The Chief Justice shall receive a salary of six thousand dollars, and each of the associate judges a salary of five thousand five hundred dollars annually until otherwise provided by law. The court shall appoint its own clerks; the judges shall be elected for the term of ten years. What changes were made with respect to Supreme Court judges in the 1852 constitution? Check all that apply.

The salary of associate justices was increased.
The number of associate justices was increased.
Judges were no longer to be elected to the position.
The length of a judge's term was increased.
The salary of the chief justice was increased.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 14:30, pamelaacuna

How do goods differ from services? (economics)

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:00, sjsmith21

Which statement best describes the relationship between the rule of law and democratic forms of government? o a. the rule of law ensures that leaders can only exercise the powers the people give them. b. the rule of law requires direct democracies to introduce representative government. o c. the rule of law allows elected officials to issue extremely harsh punishments for criminals. o d. the rule of law prevents democracies from growing too large to be efficiently governed.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 03:00, rosarioemily580

How is an objective summary different from an argumentative essay? o a. a summary should remain neutral, but an argumentative essay should promote a certain viewpoint. o b. a summary should use direct quotations, but an argumentative essay should paraphrase evidence. o c. a summary should include a works-cited list, but an argumentative essay should not cite others' work. o d. a summary should focus on a thesis, but an argumentative essay should address many different topics.

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 10:30, imthatsavageboi

Compare nicolson's written account with the visual representation in the painting on page 741 of your textbook. what are some of the similarities? what are some of the differences?

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

100 POINTS FOR CORRECT ANSWER ! Constitution of 1845: ART. 64. The Supreme Court shall be composed...