Arizona's new immigration law takes effect this week. According to the law, police officers must check the status of anyone who may be an undocumented immigrant. Officers have the right to decide who is checked under this law. Which argument would a supporter use to show that this law is necessary? (5 points)

The US Constitution gives the states the right to make their own laws

Explanation:

The Constitution of the United States is the written document and the main  book of governance according to which the country functions. The Constitution gives several rights to the government of United States to make their own laws and frame policies for the people for their welfare and which is necessary for national security.

In the context, Arizona government have made new law of immigration where police officers have the right to check the status of any immigrant person who does not have any document. Now a supporter of this law would support by saying that the US constitution have provided the States with rights to make their own laws and regulations.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.

the buddha identified ways to end suffering and attain minerva, which is the ultimate goal of buddhism. for this purpose, he came up with the concept of the four noble truths, which were crucial to ending suffering. the last of these truths stressed following the eightfold path , which is a series of steps that allow you to live life in a proper manner. these steps would make sure that you would follow the or live life in moderation.

the eightfold path has 8 practices which are: