A school district in California held its graduation at a local church. Which statement best explains whether this action violated the establishment clause, and why?

It violated the establishment clause because it held a school function at a denominational church, which

demonstrates support for a specific religion.

It violated the establishment clause because the school needs to show support for all religions and have events at a

variety of local religious locations.

It did not violate the establishment clause because the school was not promoting religion, the location was.

It did not violate the establishment clause because the school does not force people to attend graduation.

The statement that best  explains whether this action  violated the establishment clause is option A.

The following information should be considered:

Learn more: link

It violated the establishment clause because it held a school function at a denominational church, which demonstrates support for a specific religion

Explanation:

Establishment clause, forbids the government of the United States from flavouring a particular religion or establishing a religion.

According to the scenario in the question, we can deduce that the establishment clause was violated because it held a school function at a denominational church, which demonstrates support for a specific religion. One should be neutral when it comes to religion.

b. would be the answer if not try c

hope this correct me if my answer is wrong if i am correct can you plz give me brainliest

: ) : 0 : o : d

explanation: