In the happiness of his subjects lies [a king’s] happiness, in their welfare his welfare. He shall not consider as good that which pleases him but treat as beneficial to him whatever pleases his subjects. —Arthashastra, a Maurya handbook on governance
Please help
Make a prediction about the kind of government that would result from this philosophy. What types of social and political laws would likely result from a ruler following these ideas?
Read the three paragraphs of “Division and Disunity” Then look at the map of the Maurya empire. What do the text and map convey about the geography of the Maurya empire? What different kinds of information about the Mauryan empire can you draw from both sources?Read the three paragraphs of “Deccan Kingdoms Arise.” Then look at the image from the Tamil kingdom. What do the text and the image convey about the advancements of the Tamil kingdom?

"a government in which power is divided between state and national levels". federalism is a system of government in which entities such and state and province, share power with the national government.

answer; i believe the correct answer is (the willamete valley);

answer: ensure protection from communism

explanation:

the north atlantic treaty was largely dormant until the korean war initiated the establishment of nato to implement it, by means of an integrated military structure: this included the formation of supreme headquarters allied powers europe in 1951, which adopted the western union's military structures and plans.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.