Which of the following statements is FALSE? a.
When William Travis gave the men at the Alamo a chance to leave, over 180 men stayed despite almost certain death.
b.
The Mexican government had no real political need to take the Alamo, but Santa Anna wanted to get revenge for the defeat of General Cós and teach the Texas rebels a lesson.
c.
Santa Anna’s ruthless treatment of the Texas rebels ended at Goliad where General Urrea defied his orders to massacre over 350 captured Texans.
d.
Santa Anna’s army spent two weeks at the Alamo, which gave Texans at the Convention of 1836 time to declare independence and write a constitution.

The correct answer is C. It is false that Santa Anna’s ruthless treatment of the Texas rebels ended at Goliad where General Urrea defied his orders to massacre over 350 captured Texans.

Explanation:

The Battle of the Alamo was a siege during the Texas War of Independence (1836). The Alamo was a Catholic mission building in San Antonio, the center of the Texas Independence Movement. The Texas War of Independence was a military conflict between Mexico and rebels who fought for independence from Texas, part of the Mexican state of Coahuila y Texas at the time. The war ended with the independence of the Republic of Texas.  

On February 23, 1836, Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna with 5,000 soldiers raided the city garrison where 180 to 200 Texan warriors were stationed, including colonists Davy Crockett and Jim Bowie. The limited group of Texans withdrew to the Alamo. They would not surrender and the siege would last until March 6. The Texans ran out of ammunition and were then stormed by the Mexicans. All men were killed.

C. Santa Anna’s ruthless treatment of the Texas rebels ended at Goliad where General Urrea defied his orders to massacre over 350 captured Texans

Explanation:

I got it right.

Hope this Helps!

typical characteristics of global cities include all of the following except being culturally isolationist.

explanation:

in griswold v. connecticut (1965), the supreme court ruled that a state's ban on the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy.