EZ PTS if u answer it rlly ez!! Think of a famous person -- alive or dead --- you'd like to meet. Imagine an unusual circumstance where this person enters your life. Perhaps Beethoven and your uncle Gus collected pop bottles together, or Tarzan taught you how to swing. Maybe you were Mona Lisa and Leonardo cooked you pasta primavera... Exaggerate. Stretch the boundaries of what is possible. Go to the edge of what might be or have been. Then develop a dialogue between the 2 of you.

Write a brief scenario. Imagine your scene as a play. Here is some help in generating, punctuating, formatting dialogue.

I would like Einstien to teach me how to sound smart when I talk.

Dialogue:

E: Okay, so if you say "squared" instead of "to the second power" it makes it sound like you don't care if anybody else knows what that means. you can use math vocabulary, like "variables" instead of "letters".

M: You basically just defined your whole "E=MC2" thing.

E: I know. I used those rules to make that up in a way that would intrigue people.

M: Okay, let me try. "if 2x+4x=32, what is the variable x equal to?"

E: Not bad...

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

benito

: ) hava a nice day