How did Achebe's depiction of pre-colonial Africans differ from how most Europeans had previously described them?

Achebe's novel 'Things Fall Apart' tends to depict the difference between the Pre-colonial Africa from that depicted by Europeans. Europeans in their texts depicted Africans as someone who are brute and barbarians and who needed to be taught and enlightened by Europeans.

Explanation:

'Things Fall Apart' is an initial novel of late Chinua Achebe, published in 1958.

The novel portrayed the difference between Africa depicted by Europeans after colonization and Africa before European colonization. In their texts and novels, Europeans depicted Africans as barbarian who needed to be taught and educated by Europeans.

Whereas, Achebe's novel 'Things Fall Apart' depicts the Africa through Igbo society. He picturizes both the negative and positive picture of it. Through the means of his novel, he wanted to inform his readers about the rich culture and values of pre-colonized Africa, which was blurred in European novels.

part a. there were 250 teenagers surveyed (100% of tenagers = 250)therefore 1 % = 250/100 = 2.5 76% = 1% x 76 = 2.5 x 76 = 190 teenagers of the 250 surveyed liked burgerspart b: jane surveyed 25% (which is equal to 50 teenagers, i.e. a quarter of the teenagers surveyed is 50) to get 100% we simply get 4 quarters, i.e. multiply 50 by 4 = 200 teenagers were surveyed by jane. part c: it is impossible to give an example where a percentage is greater than 100%, since, by definition , percentage means "per 100".

1) checks and balances- this idea is implemented in the constitution to ensure that no one branch of the federal government gains too much power. for example, the legislative branch(congress) can approve a bill that will then be sent to the executive branch (president). if the president does not like the bill or thinks that it violates the rights of citizens, he/she can veto the bill. vetoing the bill stops the bill from becoming a law. this check on power ensures that congress makes laws that do not violate the rights of citizens.

2) anti-federalists do not want to ratify the constitution unless it includes a bill of rights. the anti-federalists are worried that the constitution gives too much power to the federal government. having a strong central government caused problems when the us was still part of great britain. this is why the anti-federalists are fearful of this type of system.

3) federalists want a new constitution passed because it will fix america's weak political structure. before the us constitution is implemented, the constitution being used is known as the articles of confederation. this constitution has an extremely weak central government, allowing for disunity among the states.

can't do the whole thing, hope this