How do Republicans feel in Democratic "safe states" like New York and Illinois and Democrats in Republican "safe states" like Oklahoma with the current Electoral College system? That they do not have an impact on the national election.

That they are the only states that should be able to vote for the President.

They have a large impact on the national election.

That they do not have an impact on the national election.

Explanation:

Due to the particular nature of presidential elections in the United States, where the Electoral College elects the President and where each state has a number of voters equal to that of its congressmen, which are determined by popular vote where the party that wins the Majority gets all of the state's electors, in states where the vast majority of voters belong to a political party (as in the case of Oklahoma with the Republican Party or Illinois with the Democratic Party), minority voters in those states logically they feel they have no interference in the national vote. This is so because, as the electors of the state will almost certainly be adjudicated to the opposing political party, their vote is nothing more than a demonstration of intention devoid of any political weight.

answer; /// the above statement is (false); the smaller states objected to the virginia plan because they would have fewer votes that the larger states;

aug 15, 2012 - although van leeuwenhoek was not the inventor of the microscope, he advanced it more he loved to grind and focus a new lens in order to see the unseen world. most of leeuwenhoek's microscopes were silver. in a simple but significant experiment (1668), he demonstrated that worms found on