Which disadvantage hindered the Mexican army during the Battle of San Jacinto?

After the Mexican triumph in the Battle of El Alamo on March 6, 1836, the Texan powers had been compelled to react constantly, while the Mexican troops won new triumphs in the clash of Refugio (March 15, 1836) and another triumph a couple of days after the fact at the Battle of Coleto (March 20), and other Mexican triumphs at Encinal del Perdido and Goliad. Given this circumstance, General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna considered the arrangement to enter the domain of Texas deserting an extensive piece of his powers under the direction of Generals Vicente Filisola and José de Urrea, in the feeling of smothering the Texan revolt it was crucial to decimate the last leftovers of the "Texan Army" driven by the American Sam Houston.

The armed force had started the oppression of the troops. Amid March and part of April, partitioned into a few segments, involved the imperative populaces. However, because of the gradualness with which the principal armed force walked, the General boss and the leader of Mexico, Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, progressed with a troop of experienced officers planning to get General Houston, along these lines starting the fourteenth April, a race in the Mexicans, that did not know the participatory territory with inconvenience, took the most exceedingly awful part.

Explanation:

is this a question? put a question ?

answer: a parliamentary system is a system of democratic governance of a state where the executive derives its democratic legitimacy from its ability to command the confidence of the legislature, typically a parliament, and is also held accountable to that parliament. in a parliamentary system, the head of state is usually a person distinct from the head of government. this is in contrast to a presidential system, where the head of state often is also the head of government and, most importantly, the executive does not derive its democratic legitimacy from the legislature.

countries with parliamentary democracies may be constitutional monarchies, where a monarch is the head of state while the head of government is almost always a member of parliament (such as the united kingdom, denmark, sweden, and japan), or parliamentary republics, where a mostly ceremonial president is the head of state while the head of government is regularly from the legislature (such as ireland, germany, india, and italy). in a few parliamentary republics, such as botswana, south africa, and suriname, among some others, the head of government is also head of state, but is elected by and is answerable to parliament. in bicameral parliaments, the head of government is generally, though not always, a member of the lower house.

parliamentarianism is the dominant form of government in europe, with 32 of its 50 sovereign states being parliamentarian. it is also common in the caribbean, being the form of government of 10 of its 13 island states, and in oceania. elsewhere in the world, parliamentary countries are less common, but they are distributed through all continents, most often in former colonies of the british empire that subscribe to a particular brand of parliamentarianism known as the westminster system.

explanation: