Do you consider the letter of Andres Bonifacio an eyewitness account of a firsthand account of the Philippine Revolution?

Andres Bonifacio's explosive letter to Emilio Jacinto was the firsthand account of the events which transpired at the Tejeros Convention.

As a firsthand account, the letter comes from the person who is involved or is at the center of the controversy that the convention tried to reconcile. Bonifacio's letter was not an eyewitness account because he did not just witness, he was involved directly in the controversy.

Andres Bonifacio founded the Katipunan society to secretly launch the Philippine Revolution of 1986 against Spanish misrule.

Andres Bonifacio wrote the explosive letter to recount the factitious struggle that erupted during the Tejeros reconciliation convention between the two factions of Katipunan society.

Thus, this firsthand account (letter) enabled his conspirators to expose Bonifacio to the Spanish authorities, who quickly put an end to his life together with his brothers'.

Learn more: link

Yes, the letter is an eyewitness account of some events that transpired during the Philippine revolution.

Explanation:

The letter of Andres Bonifacio to Emilio Jacinto was an eyewitness of the events that occurred in his own side of the country during the Philippine revolution. In that account, he explained to Emilio that most of their brothers were involved in the treachery of abandoning the course of the revolution and joining the Spaniards.

He narrated the account of when they were to be elected as officials of the Republic and how he was rejected by some people when he was chosen as Minister of Interior. They felt that he was not learned. The entire letter was an eyewitness account.

option d is correct. corroborated sources of historical evidence   is necessary to validate a claim about an event in history.

historians tend to use written sources, but audio and visual materials as well as artifacts are important objects that supply information to modern historians.

historical sources are usually divided into two categories: primary and secondary sources. depending on the historian's intent, some sources shift their designation. determining what type of sources toimplement, and the level of credibility and reliability of those sources, is a significant step in critical thinking for the historian.

explanation:

a is the final : )