History, 24.10.2020 22:00 romet31

How did the Supreme Court majority argue that “separate but equal” facilities were legal? Check all that apply. Answers:

It was said to help preserve the peace and public order.

The Constitution did not protect social rights, only civil and political rights.

:P

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 23:00, camp591

Based on the map, which statement best describes the neighborhood of washington heights? (2 points) washington heights is a gated community. people of many ethnicities live in washington heights. restrictive covenants prevent most people from living in washington heights. dominicans have gentrified washington heights. washington heights is a dominican enclave.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 05:40, turboslayer

Which of these constitutional amendments made all people born or naturalized in the united states into citizens of the united states ?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 07:00, ekerns2000paa19x

Indicate the point where a monopoly will set its price

Answers: 3

continue

History, 22.06.2019 07:50, smeeden

How is the u. s. military restricted by the third amendment? o a. the military can't confiscate people's weapons. o b. the military can't require people to serve unless a war has been declared. o c. the military can't take action against one of the states. o d. the military can't force people to host soldiers in their homes. submit

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

How did the Supreme Court majority argue that “separate but equal” facilities were legal? Check all...