Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians?
a) they can reveal to a historian exactly how people of an ancient culture lived?
b) they can provide a general summary of evidence other historians have discovered.
c) they can act as hard evidence to prove whether a society used a particular tool.
d) they can offer historians a firsthand interpretation of an important event.
Answers: 1
Other questions on the subject: History
History, 21.06.2019 22:00, tylerwayneparks
European expansion into africa left native regimes intact but had a strong impact on local societies what does this mean
Answers: 3
History, 22.06.2019 09:00, garrettbates01
Which factors in europe caused the economic situation that occurred following world war i? choose 3. question 4 options: desire for luxury goods now that the war had ended loss of life and property damage from the war high inflation refusal to trade between countries inability to pay back debts strong enforcement from the league of nations
Answers: 1
History, 22.06.2019 17:00, selfiegymnast
What was the government’s overall goal in passing the indian appropriations acts? a. to open land for white settlers b. to open land for american indians c. to confine white settlers to certain areas d. to give american indians freedom to settle
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for h...
Questions in other subjects:
Mathematics, 21.11.2019 03:31
