Why would a non-American Indian who lived in Indian Territory welcome legislation like the Dawes Act and Curtis Act? A. The legislation called for increased investment into agricultural infrastructure in Indian Territory.
B. The legislation called for major political reforms in tribal government, including allowing non-
American Indians to vote.
C. The legislation called for the release of surplus lands to be sold or allotted to settlers, allowing non-
American Indians to own land.
D. The legislation called for an end to harmful and disruptive railroad construction in Indian Territory.

C

Explanation:

The legislation called for the release of surplus lands to be sold or allotted to settlers, allowing non-American Indians to own land.

The sentence above is true because the Dawes and Curtis acts' did not wanted the tribes to invest in agricultural; nor voting; or railroads disrupting the Indian territory.

The Dawes Act wanted to make individuals own allotment and more them to farm. The Cutis act was to enforce the Dawes Act.

P.S please rate brainiest

a because i tried to vote with just my college id and the answer was no

hello,

what started the norman conquest?

profound political, administrative, and social changes in the british isles. last line of my information: )