2. How did native communities respond to the Europeans? Did all native groups everywhere view the arrival of the Spaniards in the same manner? What prompted many native communities to make alliances with the Spaniards instead of fighting (or continuing to fight)? 3. How did European impressions of native peoples change over time, and how did they remain the same?

4. How does the writing of history reflect power relations? How were these relations contested in this period?

This is specifically the invasion of the Spaniards to conquer indigenous people's mainland from the Caribbean (the Americas). If anyone can answer quickly thank you

yup, yup, yup, yup

Explanation:

your answer is

relations between the soviet union and the united states were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. the distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.

the united states government was initially hostile to the soviet leaders for taking russia out of world war i and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. although the united states embarked on a famine relief program in the soviet union in the early 1920s and american businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the new economic policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. by that time, the totalitarian nature of joseph stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the west. although world war ii brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating nazi germany, the soviet union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward eastern europe had created tensions even before the war ended.

the world may never know