Evaluate the extent to which imperial goals of the French and of the British fostered differences in their relationships with American Indians in the period from 1607 to 1754. Who ever is answering this I need like a full blown response please like a argumentative essay type of response like body paragraphs thesis statement or a claim all of that please.

theodore roosevelt challenged william to a duel, whoever won, got their policy sent to congress. it ended up in a stalemate, and both men were injured and sent to the hospital.

we will reach the goal of freedom in birmingham and all over the nation,

b is the answer i am assuming

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.