The Luso-Brazilian rebellion in Pernambuco began to be waged in 1644 and exploded on June 13, 1645, the day of Santo Antônio. One of João Fernandes' first measures was to declare the debts that the rebels had with the Dutch null and void. There was great support from the “nobility of the land”, enthusiastic about this heroic proclamation. The outbreak of this revolt in 17th century Portuguese America was the result of (a)

a) warlike weakness of the Batavian Protestants.
b) West African transatlantic trade.
c) financial assistance from Flemish dealers.
d) international diplomacy of Iberian states.
e) economic interest of planters.

Correct alternative: e) economic interest of planters.

Explanation

:Attention! The answer to that question is already in the text. Note that he mentions the joy of the Luso-Brazilians in having forgiven their debts with the Dutch. Therefore, planters would once again support the Portuguese because of this economic facility.

a) WRONG. The Dutch, also known as batavos, were well armed.

b) WRONG. Trade between Africa and Brazil was not interrupted during the Dutch occupation.

c) WRONG. "Flemish" is a synonym for Dutch. In the text quoted it is clear who helped with money were the Portuguese and not the Flemish.

d) WRONG. Portugal had already separated from Spain, so there was no interest in Iberian diplomacy, only Portuguese.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

freedom of speech is also protected by the 1 amendment.

explanation:

here is pretty much what the 1st amendment says:

congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.