If you do this i will give cookie yay :) 1. Earlier in this chapter, we discussed revolution and how to change an unjust government. Now that we have studied the French revolution and its aftermath, reevaluate your thoughts on revolution.
• Was violent revolution justified?
• Was it effective?
• Would you have advised different actions?

2. “Revolutions devour their own people” What examples from the chapter can you use to justify this quote?

3. From France’s perspective, were Congress of Vienna’s decisions fair?

4. What was the long-term legacy of the Congress of Vienna?

i am pretty sure it is a

it reintroduced the two-party system.

there are approximately 11 million illegal immigrants living in the united states.

the argument to restrict immigration is based on the perspective of protecting the safety and employment of the american people. president trump proposes to create a wall on the border with mexico, where there is the largest influx of illegal immigrants into the country.

the liberal perspective, however, is based on the argument that the us was founded by immigrants who came to build a better life with their families. in this sense, there is a special concern with the definitive legalization of "dreamers", young people who have arrived in the country as children. another important point is the concern not to cause traumas with the separation of relatives. making immigration more open would also be a good point to stimulate diversity in the us.

because he didn't know how to do it