Were the Founding Fathers justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence? In a well-developed essay that includes an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, explain whether or not the Founding Fathers were justified in declaring independence. Be sure to address counterclaims in your essay and include reasons and evidence to support your argument.

Explanation:

Yes. The Founding Fathers were very influenced by the Enlightenment movement, especially by the philosopher John Locke. John Locke defended the idea that every one of us has natural rights, these natural rights are life, liberty, and property. The role of the government is defending those rights and make possible for them to be accomplished. Once the government fails to do so, people have the right to rebel against this government and form a new one that defends these rights. Because of that, the Founding Fathers justified the rebellion against the British.

The founding fathers were justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring their independence because they felt that they were being taxed unfairly, had no representation in government, and they felt like Britain was not protecting their natural rights.

The colonists felt that they were being taxed unfairly because the British were putting a bunch of taxes on them without their consent, and the colonists wanted the freedom to buy goods from where they wanted. Britain was taking that away from them, and they got angry about that. They started to protest this, but Britain continued to tax them unfairly. Some people say that the colonists were partly responsible for the war, so they should help pay for it, while this is true, they didn't ask the colonies about it, and even after the colonists protested taxation without representation, they still continued to tax them unfairly. This is why the colonists felt that they were being taxed unfairly and without representation.

The colonists also had no representation in government. Britain put taxes on them even though the colonies didn't have a representative in Britain, and the colonists didn't like that. They felt that it was unfair for them to not have a say in the government. Some people will say that Britain used the representatives for the good of everyone, but from the colonies point of view, where they were being taxed without even having a say in this, you can clearly see that this is not true, which is why the colonies were completely justified in protesting this.

Furthermore, the colonies felt that Britain was not protecting their natural rights because they felt that they should have a say in the British government, freedom, and a right to protest an unjust government who did not protect their natural rights, but none of these things were given to them. The opposite side of this argument might say that the colonies needed to pay Britain back, and that these things interceded with that, but this is not true. The colonists felt that they should always have their natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and this makes them justified in rebelling against the British.

All of these are reasons why the founding fathers were completely justified in rebelling against Britain, the fact that they were being taxed unfairly, that they had no representation in the British government, and that Britain was not protecting their natural rights. All of this proves the argument that the founding fathers were justified in rebelling against the British government and declaring independence.

Explanation:

I couldn't find an answer on here that I could use, so I wrote this up so that other people could find something without the trouble of looking through tons of other sites.

although the crusades failed to capture jerusalem, they had several major impacts on western europe. they increased the authority of the king: sometimes nobles died in battle without leaving an heir in which case the king got their land. kings passed taxes to pay for the crusades.

cur

explanation:

cancer