I NEED HELP ASAP! In two paragraphs, explain the factors that led to the Great Compromise, including the two competing plans that came before it. Then, describe how civic virtue played a role in the Founding Fathers' acceptance of the Great Compromise.

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution."

-senate.gov

(This is from a website don't copyright")

For help and inspiration

Explanation:

The factors that led to the Great Compromise were that the delegates of the Constitutional Convention were debating on which plan to use to determine how people would be represented in the legislative branch; the Virginia Plan or the New Jersey Plan.  The large states wanted to use the Virginia Plan, which was a plan to make two houses and use the state’s population to determine the number of representatives, and the small states wanted to use the New Jersey Plan, which was a proposal to have one house and one representative per state.  In the text, it says that Roger Sherman made a compromise to make both the small and large states happy by making one house with two representatives per state, and another house with the population of the state to determine the number of representatives per state.  This shows that the Great Compromise was created because of the major debate over which plan to use for the legislative branch.

Civic virtue played a role in the Founding Fathers’ acceptance of the Great Compromise by allowing them to do what they think is best for the country.  The passage states that Goerge Washington, Roger Sherman, and James Madison all demonstrated civic virtue by willing to compromise and do what they thought was best for the country.  This explains that without civic virtue, the Founding Fathers wouldn’t have been able to listen to other peoples’ opinions and find compromise.

a revolutionary war veteran

the intolerable acts were punitive laws passed by the british parliament in 1774 after the boston tea party. in great britain, these laws were referred to as the coercive acts.