Below is a description of a source you want to use for a world history paper. As you read the description, keep in mind what you've learned about historical thinking skills and use those skills in evaluating whether or not to use the source. Is this a trustworthy source for you to use in your paper? Why or why not? In your answer, make sure to clearly describe the standards you are using to evaluate it. Why have you determined that it is or is not a trustworthy one to use? (4 points) Title: "Comparing the Technology of Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt." Author: Dr. Jane Smith, Professor of History at the University of Chicago. Location: Ancient Cultures, a monthl

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.

e imma say squidward tentacles

`stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar current or future case. stare decisis ensures that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, unless overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the us supreme court. simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

stare decisis is a latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided".

it is a : ) always outside of government control