Plea bargains can be helpful to defendants in criminal cases because they can:
O A. prevent the police from getting search warrants.
B. result in lighter penalties than being found guilty.
C. allow a judge to decide on a verdict without a jury.
D. force the government to provide defendants with a
lawyer.
SUBMIT

Hey There!! ⁓(⁄‣⁌‸‸⁍⁄‣)⁓

The answer to this is:

D. force the government to provide defendants with a  lawyer.

The trial penalty has made the government the most powerful player in the criminal justice system.

Although the defendantis cloaked in the presumption ofinnocence and the prosecutor theoretically

has the burden of proof, as the Report makes clear, the mere decision to charge triggers a domino

effect making a guilty plea the only rational choice in most cases. And as trials and hearings decline,

so too does government accountability. Government mistakes and misconduct are rarely uncovered,

or are simply resolved in a more favorable plea bargain.  

Moreover, the ease of conviction can

encourage sloppiness, and a diminution of the government’s obligation to fairness.

Defense counsel, whose role is to ensure that “all other rights of the accused are protected, spend

most of their time negotiating plea bargains and drafting sentencing memoranda. As a result of

the trial penalty, not only are defense counsel trying fewer cases, they are frequently forced to settle

cases before meaningful investigation and litigation of the government’s case.

The prevalence of guilty pleas sidelines judges from their traditional supervisory role. Rather than

scrutinizing the sufficiency and legality of the government’s case, they are reduced to rubberstamping plea bargains. If a mandatory minimum sentencing statute controls, judges do not even

exercise their traditional sentencing role.  

The decline in the number of trials, and the litigation that precedes them, also causes advocacy

skills to atrophy on both sides of the adversarial system. The federal courthouse in Manhattan,

for example, held only 50 trials in 2015. Many defense lawyers and prosecutors have not tried cases

in years, and many of the federal judges have similarly not presided over a trial in years.  

As one

judge summed up the impact of the vanishing trial: “The entire system loses an edge and . . . the

quality of justice in our courthouses has suffered as a result.

Hope It Helped!~

Hope This Explanation Help you.

And, Tell me if this answer is wrong...

And, Good Luck With Your Assignment!~

⁓

(づ¨⁌⁔¨⁍)づ

which

like dude you only explained

the problem not the