the confiscation acts allowed the government to seize property from easterners westerners patriots loyalists who had supported britain in the war

Whoever gets these right gets marked brainlest frods and wrong anwsers will get reported and emaild to for doing this just for points! history and geography 600 – unit 6: eastern europe quiz 3: modern history 1.in communism, no one owns any private property. truefalse 2.communism ended in eastern europe because would no longer support it with military force. germany great britain the soviet union the united states 3.the soviet union was ruled by the secretary general and a committee of fifteen men called the kievs politburo villeins bolsheviks 4.one way to begin the communist revolution was to create among the workers. poverty dissension 5.the first world power to embrace communism was rassia germani china 6.the capital of east germany was: brussels east berlin bonn warsaw 7.one balkan country is: romania russia poland germany 8.in the balkan countries, the romans built: roads churches public baths stores 9.the soviet leader whose reforms led to the end of communism in russia and eastern europe was: joseph stalin lech walesa mikhail gorbachev nikita khrushchev 10.communist leaders came to power without the backing of the soviet union in: poland east germany yugoslavia hungary 11.stalin was: kind benevolent cruel live 12.the former name of the russian communists was: . romanovs bolsheviks vladimirs kievs 13.khrushchev improved living conditions for the russian people by: reducing the secret police reading the bible letting people own property having free elections you to all the people that have the right anwser

World war i is generally considered to be the first instance of total war. where every of-age citizen and all possible resources are mobilized in the war effort. in light of this, do you believe britain's blockade of germany-which eventually extended to all goods, thereby violating international law-was justified? explain your opinion.

William marbury did not win his case against james madison. what was chief justice marshall's reasoning for why the court could not produce a writ of mandamus, even though marshall agreed that marbury's commission should have been delivered to him?