GUYS I REALLY NEED HELP PLEASE! THANK YOUU! Speculate on what would have occurred historically had there not been a compromise. How would the trajectory of history have changed? How might the European powers take advantage of the situation? Explain your reasoning.

As they debated the controversial treaty-making clause, the delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention considered, but did not follow in whole, those precedents with which they were most familiar. In Great Britain, treaties were made by the king and, in certain cases, had to be approved by a majority vote in Parliament. The Continental Congress, which had no executive branch, dispatched agents to negotiate treaties. The treaties only went into effect after two-thirds (nine out of thirteen) of the states approved the documents. This inefficient process was further complicated by the states’ ability to enter into their own treaties. While the delegates agreed that the states could not continue to make treaties with foreign powers, they disagreed over the manner in which the United States should negotiate, draft, and ratify international pacts.

Explanation:

qawsedrftgyhunjmk,secfebgsefcbyescfb ncfebn sexcfbhsexcfb ncb n

Explanation:

supplies had to travel a long distance across water on ships that were often attacked, so they did not reach europe