The engraving, “The Pilgrims signing the compact,” helps historians understand what happened at the signing of the Mayflower Compact in 1620. Do you agree or disagree? Use your knowledge of the Mayflower Compact and your Historical Thinking Skills to support your answer. Be sure to utilize the ACE method to write your response.

Yes, agreed. However, it's necessary to go beyond the engraving to understand what really happened.

Explanation:

An engraving, like any other art piece, gives us a point of view. So, in order to use art as a historical source, we have to support our answer and explanation with readings and writings of the period. As we know, the Mayflower Compact is a document where the Pilgrims addressed it with just and egalitarian laws for the general good of colonization and according to the will of the majority. Mayflower passengers knew that previous New World settlers had failed due to the lack of a government system. They discussed its content and then drafted the Pact for the sake of their own survival. So, after reading the document, and the point of view of other historians, we can support our answer carefully and use the engraving.

the graphs indicate that few people in bolivia work in industry, as that is the least expressive sector shown in the respective graphic.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.