In what ways did Chute-pa-lu laws differ from white laws? Did the two groups share some beliefs about laws? What was the significance of spirit law," and how did it differ from other laws, if at all?

The answer is given below

Explanation:

The chute-pa-lu laws was different from the white laws because they believed that land belonged to everyone, taking another man's land wasn't encouraged and that all men should be treated equally and fairly and that lying is disgraceful. The Chute-pa-lu Laws was typically more peaceful than the white laws.

Chute-pa-lu and white laws shared some beliefs about laws. For example, they both believed that there's a god or a great spirit that sees and hears everything that people do and what we do presently has an effect on our afterlife.

The significance of spirit laws was simply to bring together the people from both groups, and it should be noted that it wasn't really different really at all from the laws of the white men except that they didn’t really speak about everything that they had already planned for the people of Chute-pa-lu.

b) the importance and limits of political power.

the main inference that can be drawn from jean jacques rousseau's book the social contract is: a. people can enjoy civil and physical freedom, even if it sometimes harms society.