Which statement best describes the relationship between resources and military conquest in the ancient world? Wealthy civilizations suffered fewer invasions.
Wealthy civilizations conquered neighboring areas.
Poor civilizations aggressively expanded into nearby lands.
Poor civilizations were less tempting targets for aggressive neighbors.

Wealthy civilizations conquered neighboring areas.

Explanation:

Land has always been a valuable resource and in the ancient world was a sign of how much power a nation possessed.

With the wealth accumulated by the wealthier civilizations, they were better able to not only raise armies but to equip them as well.

They would then use these armies to conquer neighbouring areas to increase their influence and area of control and to show how powerful they were.

can you attach the graph and answer options (:

yes based on alexanders actions he deserved the title of "the great". his empire covered about 3,000 miles and he was able to establish the empire over a 13 year period of time. he was able to conquer many different places. he also defeated the persians. he conquered egypt and developed a city and named it after himself.