Stephen D. Krasner wrote, "For many states, there is no longer a sharp distinction between citizens and noncitizens. Permanent residents, guest workers, refugees, and undocumented immigrants are entitled to some bundle of rights even if they cannot vote. [This is due to] ease of travel and the desire of many countries to attract either capital or skilled workers." How would supporters of international organizations respond to this statement?

Supporters of international organizations would appreciate this idea.

Explanation:

On a global platform, there is increased awareness about the movement of labor and capital across the nations. However, different cultural traditions pose a problem to these scenarios because of stereotypes regarding different cultures. This statement ensures that non-citizens would enjoy the same rights even if they have not granted citizenship and this would help immigrants to adjust in the nation. However, it should be noted here that unregistered immigration causes many problems for the countries and international organizations need to keep a close watch on it.        

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.

i would say that the politicial parties from state to state varies.