Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian? A) they can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted
B)They can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone
C) they can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period
D) they can help a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence

answer: your option is d

explanation:

a drastic rise in oil prices ended decades of postwar.

answer by yourhope:

the speaker of which statement would be best served by joining an interest group?

i want politicians to make more of an effort for lgbt rights!

: )

`stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar current or future case. stare decisis ensures that cases with identical facts be approached in the same way, unless overruled by the same court or a higher court such as the us supreme court. simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.

stare decisis is a latin term meaning "to stand by that which is decided".