According to the lesson, historian Stephen Ambrose said 'You don't hate history...' Finish this sentence. Select one: a. You REALLY hate history. b. You love history. c. You hate the way it was taught to you in high school. d. You just hate Mr. O'Gara.

c. You hate the way it was taught to you in high school.

Explanation:

According to the lesson, historian Stephen Ambrose said 'You don't hate history, You hate the way it was taught to you in high school’. He was trying to point out that history was a very interesting and unique subject which is meant to be loved by all individuals as it focuses on past and historical events of different subjects.

He was of the opinion that those who felt they hated it was probably because of how they were taught the subject in their various high school.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

answer: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

explanation: