In what ways did the Church reforms of the sixteenth century lead to the founding of new religious orders, and how did those religious orders promote the reforms in response

-The Jesuits promoted the preaching and teaching of Church reforms.

Jesuit priests played an important role in the Catholic Reformation. It was their responsibility to catechize and to rethink entire peoples and nations. In Germany, for example, thanks to the apostolic commitment of these priests, many who had sympathy for Luther, ended up staying in the Catholic Church, and did not follow the thoughts of the Protestant Reformation.

-The Council shaped the orders by the mandates of the Council.

The Ecumenical Council in Trent, whose violent effects determined the explicit rejection of Protestantism, the officialization of Thomism (of St. Thomas Aquinas) and the Vulgate (Latin version of the Bible), the condemnation of apocryphal or deuterocanonical books, the publication of a list of prohibited books - the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (from 1559) and the Inquisition. The Council reaffirmed that salvation is by faith and also by works; and also confirmed services to the saints, the Virgin Mary and relics; reactivated the Tribunal of the Holy Office (Inquisition) and reaffirmed the doctrine of papal infallibility

-The Cardinals lead by example by promoting chastity and poverty.

The vows taken in the act of religious consecration express a path to the radical experience of the donation of the religious to God, his whole life will be fully available for following Christ. The purpose of the vows is to provide the consecrated person with a break from all human conditions, whether personal, cultural or ideological, being authentic in the proclamation of the Gospel made by him. In turn, they are decisive in the missionary life of the consecrated person because, through them, the bonds that prevent us from serving with love to the brothers are broken. They express a gesture of total freedom and availability.

Explanation:

the american colonists were happy with their vicorty, but the french were mad and the french and indians were not alies, and neither were the french and colonist. i think,

cjokvxdtjvv