Argue to show how Descartes dream argument offers philosophical basis for the illegality of instant justice

Descartes' dream argument states that human senses are flawed, and that we cannot fully understand reality by relying solely on them. To show this he provides the example of dreams. Although dreams are not real, our senses often believe them to be.

The fact that humans are not always able to distinguish reality clearly shows that we should not rely on instant justice. In order for us to access instant justice, we would have to know for a fact what the circumstances surrounding a crime are, without any further analysis. This is normally consider illegal. Instead, most societies access justice through a long process that includes arrests, trials and testimonies. This is intended to offer a clearer and less fallible understanding of reality, and therefore, a more just judgement.

the reform movements that arose during the antebellum period in america focused on specific issues: temperance, abolishing imprisonment for debt, pacifism, antislavery, abolishing capital punishment, amelioration of prison conditions (with prison's purpose reconceived as rehabilitation rather than punishment), the humane treatment of animals, the humane and just treatment of native americans, the establishment of public institutions for the care of the destitute, orphans, blind, and mentally ill, the establishment of public schools, the abolition of tobacco use, vegetarianism, health reform, homeopathic medicine, woman's rights (including, at first, especially the establishment of a woman's right to own property apart from her husband and her right to sue for divorce), and the amelioration of labor conditions (including higher pay, the right to form unions, the right to strike, and the demand for limits on the number of work hours, and safe working conditions).

explanation:

they spoke the dravidian language. hope this , correct me if im wrong