Which party is more likely to turn Uhuru into a client state of the Soviet Union — one that is dependent on the USSR — and why? Which party is more likely to set up a pro-Western government, and why?

What might be the result of supporting the Brown Party with soft or hard power?

Answer these questions fully and un plagiarized please, if it is good, I will give brainy.

1. The Brown Party: This party is seen to be more likely to turn the Uhuru into a client state of the Soviet Union because of its desire to be near to other countries. Also, the party wants to invest in other foreign nations. An interest to work with the Soviet Union will be as a result of the party's desire to work with other nations.

2. The Green Party: This party faction is more likely to set up a pro-Western government because of its focus on agriculture. Also, under the Central Government, its desire is to nationalize the utilities, agriculture, even the mining industries.

The Green Party also desires to stay neutral in the Cold War. This is seen as the best for the United States because they will not get involved with other nations.

3. Supporting the Brown Party with soft power will result to better and fruitful negotiations with other nations. This is because it wants close relationships with those nations. Such a decision might not work due to the fact that when a country is working out agreements with other countries, it can be sometimes be hard or difficult. Also, it can take up too much time.

While supporting Brown Party with hard power could result to more development in weapons and also lead to an increase in tensions resulting to war.

lee and grant, both of whom held the highest rank in their respective armies, had known each other slightly during the mexican-american war (1846-48) and began their dialogue by exchanging awkward personal inquiries. characteristically, grant had arrived in his mud-splattered field uniform while lee had turned out in full dress attire, complete with sash and sword.

explanation: