Use the map below to answer the following question: What is a geographical difference between southern Europe and northeastern Europe? (5 points) Select one: a. Southern Europe has a large number of mountains, while northeastern Europe is mostly flat. b. Southern Europe is mostly flat, while northeastern Europe is mostly mountainous. c. Southern Europe is a land of large rivers and lakes, while northeastern Europe is dry and arid. d. Southern Europe has few rivers and lakes, while northeastern Europe has more lakes than forests.

The answer is A. Southern Europe has a large number of mountains, while northeastern Europe is mostly flat.

Explanation:

The map presents the geographical features of Europe, especially bodies of water, which are marked in blue and the elevations, which is mark by different colors on the map. The second feature shows the location and height of hills, mountains, and similar. Additionally, according to the conventions in the map higher elevations are shown in orange and yellow while low elevations are shown in green.

In this context, we can observe in the Northeast of Europe the color green predominates, and this indicates in this zone most of the territory is flat and there are no high mountains or similar. On the opposite, in the South East of Europe, there are higher elevations, which are shown by the colors orange and yellow on the map. Thus, the southern region has many mountains or elevated areas while the northeastern area has a flat territory (Option A).

they both built pyramids.

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is